Out of all furniture needs, the chair may be the most imperative. While many other items (except the bed) are meant to support objects, the chair supports a human form. The term chair is intended to be used here in the most open sense, from stool to throne to complex makes for example the bench and sofa, which may be viewed as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not obviously definitive.
The social history of the chair is as intriguing as its history as a creative craft. The chair is not merely a physical support and/or an aesthetic object; it is also a signifier of social standing. From the old royal courts there were important distinctions between having a chair with arms, sitting on a chair with a back but without arms, and having to make do with a stool. In the 20th century, the director’s and/or manager’s chair has developed an identifier of superior rank, and in democratic governments the speaker sits on a high-set level.
As its furniture creation, the chair can be utilised for a range of different purposes. There are chairs designed to match man’s age and physical capabilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to connotate his rank in society (the executive chair, the throne). During the olden days there were chairs for births (birth chairs); in the 20th century, there have been chairs used to die in (the electric chair). We have chairs with one, two, three, and four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can make chairs that can be folded up, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our modern lifestyle has demanded special chairs for use in automobiles and aircraft. Every one of these chair shapes have adapted to fit to different human uses. For its unique link with man, the chair appears to its full importance only when being utilised. Though it makes no difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a dresser drawers if there might be things inside or not, a chair is best seen and fairly tested by a person sitting in it, for chair and sitter complement the other. Thus the several areas of a chair are named corresponding to the parts of the human body: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the first function of the chair is to support the human body, its credit is tested basically by how completely it does fulfill this practical role. In the construction of a chair, the builder is restricted by some static legislation and principal measurements. Within these restrictions, however, the chair creator has marvellous freedom.
The history of the chair covers an epoch of several thousand years. There are cultures that have created iconic chair shapes, as expressions of the leading craft in the industries of craft and creativity. Out of these such societies, particular mention can be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the ascendancy of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the construct of expert design, are found from tomb findings. The first one of them is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The classical Egyptian chair had four legs structured as akin to those of a chosen animal, a curved seat, and a sloping back supported from vertical stretchers. In this way a stable triangular structure was created. There was to our understanding no particular change from the design of Egyptian thrones and chairs for typical non-royals. The only variation lies in the kind of ornamentation, in the selection of more costly inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all probability was designed to be an easily packed seat for army officers. As a camp stool that chair persevered til much later points. But the stool then also played the role of a ceremonial seat, its original role as a folding stool fast forgotten. This can now be found, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, crafted in ebony with ivory inlay decoration and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are in the structure of folding stools but are not able to be folded because the seats are made with wood. The easy manufacture of the folding stool, being of two frames that spin on metal bolts and bear a seat of leather or fabric held between them, reappears somewhat later during the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The most well known of those is the folding stool, crafted out of ashwood, now seen at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The unique Greek chair, the klismos, is recognised not from any ancient specimen still existing but as seen from a wealth of pictorial evidence. The most well known is the klismos posited on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial area near Athens (c. 410 BC). This is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of these legs can be seen. These creative legs were thought to be executed with bent wood and were probably bore extreme pressure from the weight of the sitter. The joints attaching the legs to the frame of the seat would have been therefore very strong and were clearly drawn.
The Romans borrowed from the Greek chair; evidence of statues of seated Romans offer examples of a thicker and which appear to be a kind of less delicately built klismos. Both features, the light or the heavy, were seen again in the Classicist epoch. The klismos chair is used in French Empire design, in English Regency, and in some particular kinds of considerable uniqueness of Denmark and Sweden from 1800.
China
The past of the chair in China isn’t able to be followed as well as the progression of the chairs in Egypt and Greece. Since the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unscathed series of drawings and works of art was protected, with images of the insides and exterior of Chinese homes and their furniture. Also preserved of the 16th century are a trove of chairs constructed of wood or lacquered wood, that possess an intriguing resemblance to designs of ancient chairs.
Just the same as in Egypt, there existed two iconic chair forms in China: a chair having four legs and a folding stool. That four-legged chair was constructed both with and without arms but never without its square seat and straight stiles (upright side supports) to support the back. In one kind, it has been seen, the stiles were delicately curved on top of the arms to conform correctly to the shape of the S-shaped back splat (the basic upright of its chairback). Together, all three parts are mortised on the yoke-like top rail. While the style of a back splat then had an inspiration for English chairs from the Queen Anne period, wooden items that just to a limited extent reinforce corner joints (and furthermore are loose to top it off) indicate a feature signatory to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which finishes around the rounded staves. All the members are round in section or is given rounded edges—acknowledging as may be to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not pleasant and occasionally had a plaited bottom. These chairs needed the sitter to be stiff and upright; for if too much weight is placed on the back, the chair has a habit of collapsing. In patriarchal Chinese households of this period armchairs probably were reserved only for the senior members of the family, for they were greatly respected.
The Chinese folding stool is understood to have come to China from the West. It is akin much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a variation in that the top rail is delicately fixed to the two legs of the stool with a curved member, which is usually provided with metal mounts. From a Western perspective the resulting effect of both furniture designs is stylized. The construction and decorative aspects are combined in a manner that is all at once both naïve and refined. The piecemeal appearance is an outcome of the fact that the individual parts do not seem to have been adjoined by either glue or screws, but had been mortised into one another and held in its place in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain of the 17th century also put its mark on the chair. Paintings show a style of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, having only two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in between, stitched to bring out a pattern of tiny pads. The front board and a similar board in the back could be folded after loosening some tiny iron hooks. In this way the chair was an easily portable piece of furniture while traveling which, at the same period, had the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered kind of chair can be evidenced in engravings of the interiors of affluent Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, as well as in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Although this type of chair can also be made in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won critical acclaim, it is not determined that the design actually originated in The Netherlands. Usually, the legs of the chair will be smooth, round in section, and of slender measurements; they are in some cases baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is clearly a bourgeois piece of furniture and was crafted in vast amounts, as can be seen from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is a whole row of such chairs lined up by a wall. The style asserts itself by virtue of its shapely proportions and expensive upholstery in gilt leather or fabric framed with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature of styles—that was, as developed in Paris around 1750—disseminated through most of Europe and was imitated or copied during the mid-20th century. The design owes its popularity to a combination of leisure and charm. The seat suits to the human body and allows a relaxed sitting position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Generally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are small upholstered pads over the armrests. Smooth transitions are made between seat frame, legs, and back conceal all the joints, which are solidly constructed on craftsmanlike practices in spite of the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of them are made from wood of quite thick dimensions; but every member is deeply molded, all extra wood has been removed, and more upmarket examples may be further embellished with very delicate and decorative carvings. The wood can be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is often used for all of the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; cane is in some cases used rather than upholstery.
English chairs of the 18th century were more open in design than the French. The French touch for stylistic uniformity, which disseminated from the highest circles in Paris and Versailles over most of France and became the favourite in several parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became commonly known and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
Within the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper styles of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, hint that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office storage in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.